-
Reported Result
In intoxicated patients the HII score shows a predicable improvement in sobriety over time, and agreed with staff assessment of sobriety
Our Opinion
Overall: a reasonable paper however needs further validation
Issues highlighted
- Internal validity
- Small Study: only looked at 120 patients over 6 months
- Convenient sample: what information was missed, potential source of bias
- Retrospective: how much data was lost would this have influence outcome.
- Bias: how did using the HII score, influence how drunk staff thought patients were, and vice versa did staff perception influence the scoring of the HII score?
- Loss of data: exclusion of patients who had suspicions results recorded (improved validity to final answer, but may not reflect real world use)
- External validity
- Population: Similar sized ED, with similar standard of assessing if patient was “drunk” and not medically unwell.
- Single site: one hospital in USA, would we get the same result in our population?
- Results: study states that if maximally intoxicated (score=1), will improve predictably by 1/8 every 2 hours to sobriety (score=0). As you would expect that the number of patients in the study dropped off quickly. 120 patients had results from 0-2hrs, only 65 had results from 2-4hrs and 29 had results from 4-6 hr. So has this really shown a predictable improvement.
- Discussion
- An interesting paper that currently we can’t take into our current practice with out validation.
- Potential Benefits: highlighting those patients that are deteriorating or not improving as expected, in a measurable manner, and thus triggering reassessment for missed medical issues.
- Potential Problems: staff training and time to perform
- Internal validity