& today has been all about the Heart (New MI definition, Think Aorta, Failure) + some disaster med for my own interest
4th universal Definition of MI
Whats New?
- ECG criteria
- ST Elevation (Will this effect who we send for PPCI? – we need to find out)
- NEW 1mm Elevation in 2 contiguous leads (Chest OR Limb)
- Except V2–V3
- ≥ 2mm in men ≥ 40 years
- ≥ 2.5 mm in men < 40 years
- ≥ 1.5 mm in women regardless of age
- Non ST Elevation
- New horizontal or downsloping ST-depression ≥ 0.5 mm in 2 contiguous leads
- and/or T inversion > 1 mm in 2 contiguous leads with prominent R wave or R/S ratio > 1
- ST Elevation (Will this effect who we send for PPCI? – we need to find out)
- Now 6 types of MI defined – types 1 and 2 we need to think about in ED
- Type 1 – Our traditional Plaque rupture which – ACS treatment
- Type 2 – Oxygen supply mismatch (shock, arrhythmia, sepsis, dissection, atheroma, etc.) – Treat the cause
- Type 3 – Sudden cardiac death, presumed MI but no tests done
- Type 4 – Proceedure induce (a) PPCI, (b) Stent
- Type 5 – CABG induced
- “Myocardial injury” definition – Trop >99th gentile with out acute myocardial ischaemia.
4th universal definition of MI – there is also an app look for ESC
ACS
- The Trop 99th Centile is good for diagnosis NOT prognosis
- MI defined as Trop >99th Centile (chosen originally to avoid false +ve’s all other tests based on 95th Centile)
- Trop > 85th Centile – heralds increased all cause mortality
- High-Sensitivity Trop (We don’t have it!!! – but it’s coming)
- LoD (limit of detection) – you can rule out poor prog ACS if the initial trop is below the LoD & you have the right test (but need 2-3 hrs from pain to taking that sample)
- Risk scores & LoD rule out – risk scores with this strategy don’t improve sensitivity but do reduce the numbers you can discharge early.
- Above LoD look at delta (i.e.change) – In an MI this should change either increase or decrease depending on where you are on the curve (Beware – you might be near the peak and 2 results may not show much change)
- Increased mortality? – Swedish registry data has indicated increased all cause mortality – Is that over diagnosis and investigation or lack of thinking as we think we have ruled things out?
Acute Heart Failure
- As you might expect TIME MATTERS
- Mortality increased by 1%/hour IV treatment not started
- Treatment after 12hrs from onset makes little difference
- GTN/Vasodilators – are a mainstay
- Diuretics – Frusemide >160mg has been shown to increase mortality
- NIV – consider if RR>25, SaO2 <90% (can reduce respiratory distress, reduce intubation, but no effect on mortality)
- BNP >845 shows increased mortality – we have it available
- Look for CHAMP and treat
- aCs
- Hypertension
- Arrhythmia
- acute Mechanical (rupture/trauma)
- Pe
Think Aorta
- In Type A dissection – mortality increases by 1%/hr they don’t get to theatre
- 1:3 dissections initially treated as something else
- 1:2 dissections – not on initial differential
- D-Dimer not good enough
- Get a CT!!!!
PE – Pulmonary Embolis
- PERC – Can be used in low risk as a rule out – used in USA >10yrs validated france and belgium
- Age related D-Dimer cut off in over 50’s (Age x 10)
- Dutch have suggested using cut off of 1000 -Unless the following triggered on wells (hemoptysis, signs of deep vein thrombosis and ‘PE most likely’)
Syncope
- PATCH – If patients with ‘Unexplained Syncope’ have cardiac monitoring 1:10 are found to have a significant arrhythmia.
Disaster/Terror
- Evidence of delayed problems downstream from event – PTSD in earthquakes and MI’s post-terror attack.